RSSVolume 6

IJLLD 6.2

IJLLD 6.2

| August 3, 2020

IJLLD Volume 6.2 (2016) (Frontsmatter) Shu Zhao and Yanan Guo. On Ethnic Minority Language Interpretation System and Practice in Court in China … 1-17 Weidong Li and Qiang Tian. Translation between Mongolian and Chinese Languages in the Criminal Proceedings —From the Perspective of Protecting Procedural Rights of Mongolian Defendants in China … 18-34 Xin Fu. […]

Continue Reading

6.2 Guo & Zhao

| August 3, 2020

Yanan Guo & Shu Zhao. (2016). On the Legal Protection of the Urban Ethnic Minority Migrant Population as a Vulnerable Group– Hohhot. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(2), 64-78. Abstract: he ethnic minority migrant population is not only the reflection of urban and rural floating, but also the reflection of the cross-ethnic interaction. […]

Continue Reading

6.2 Liang

| August 3, 2020

Yali Liang. (2016). Observations and Reflections on the Pre-trial Evidence Discovery in China——Based on the Pilot Activities in Some Local Courts and Procuratorates. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(2), 50-63. Abstract: Along with the two recent amendments of the Criminal Procedure Law in China (1996 and 2012), there are some pilots on evidence […]

Continue Reading

6.2 Fu

| August 3, 2020

Xin Fu. (2016). On the Fairness and Communications in the Trial of Criminal Cases in China An Empirical Analysis from the Perspective of Criminal Defence. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(2), 35-49. Abstract: It is generally accepted that the rights of suspects and defendants shall be properly protected in a criminal trial. The […]

Continue Reading

6.2 Li & Tian

| August 3, 2020

Weidong Li and Qiang Tian. (2016). Translation between Mongolian and Chinese Languages in the Criminal Proceedings From the Perspective of Protecting Procedural Rights of Mongolian Defendants in China. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(2), 18-34. Abstract: There are five minorities’ autonomous regions in China, including the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in Northeast area. […]

Continue Reading

6.2 Zhao & Guo

| August 3, 2020

Shu Zhao and Yanan Guo. (2016). On Ethnic Minority Language Interpretation System and Practice in Court in China. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(2), 1-17. Abstract: The right of language is a fundamental human right. The Constitution of China stipulates that the minority litigant’s rights in taking proceedings in his native language should […]

Continue Reading

IJLLD 6.1

IJLLD 6.1

| August 2, 2020

IJLLD Volume 6.1 (2016) (Frontsmatter) Inoue Masako. The Notion of Contemporary Asymmetry and Access to Justice of a Vulnerable Group: Focusing on Domestic Violence Victims in Japan … 1-10 Philip Osarobo Odiase. Reception of the Evidence of Vulnerable Witnesses in Legal Proceedings in Nigeria … 11-28 Tomas Berkmanas. ‘Doing Sanctions with Words’: Legacy, Scope, Fairness […]

Continue Reading

6.1 Andersson

| August 2, 2020

Ulrika Andersson. (2016). Communications of autonomy and vulnerability in criminal proceedings. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(1), 37-44. Abstract: In some high-profile Swedish cases on violence in intimate relationships, policemen and judges have been blamed for missing important aspects of the victim’s vulnerable situation and the ongoing violence, and indirectly causing the death […]

Continue Reading

6.1 Berkmanas

| August 2, 2020

Tomas Berkmanas. (2016). ‘Doing Sanctions with Words’: Legacy, Scope, Fairness and Future (?) of a Reprimand. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(1), 29-36. Abstract: The paper aims at presenting with the short analytical expose of a phenomenon of a reprimand as a matter of the legal process and, more specifically, the specific – […]

Continue Reading

6.1 Odiase

| August 2, 2020

Philip Osarobo Odiase. (2016). Reception of the Evidence of Vulnerable Witnesses in Legal Proceedings in Nigeria. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 6(1), 11-28. Abstract: Generally, ensuring the quality and accuracy of witnesses’ viva voce (verbal) evidence in Court proceedings, is central to achieving fairness and transparency in legal proceedings. Incidentally, there are occasions […]

Continue Reading